The short answer
You call. You describe the trade, the site, and the timeline. The leasing company sends crew that are already on its payroll, already covered under its WorkSafeBC account, and already vetted. You pay one hourly bill rate for time on site. Everything behind that rate — wages, statutory costs, HR, and replacement — is handled by the leasing company.
The model exists because construction labour demand is lumpy and direct employment is rigid. A general contractor rarely needs the same headcount in week 3 that it needs in week 12. Leasing lets you scale the crew to the job instead of carrying fixed payroll through the slow weeks.
How labour leasing works in practice
The mechanics are simple once the relationship is set up.
- You request crew for a specific scope. Framing for a six-week residential build, concrete support for a single pour, or ongoing labour across a commercial project.
- The leasing company matches workers from its own employed roster and confirms availability.
- The crew shows up site-ready with their own PPE and certifications current.
- You direct the work on site, the same way you direct your own staff.
- You receive one invoice based on hours worked. No recruiting invoice, no severance, no WorkSafeBC reconciliation at year end.
The leasing company carries the employment relationship. That means it owns the recruiting, the onboarding, the payroll remittances, the WCB premiums, and the liability that comes with all of it. You own the schedule and the scope.
For Blue Anvil, on-site quality assurance is part of every placement. A QA rep visits the site, checks that the fit is right, and catches problems before they cost you a day. That is the difference between sending bodies and managing a crew.
Labour leasing vs. hiring direct: what is the actual difference?
The honest comparison is not the leasing bill rate against a worker's raw wage. It is the bill rate against the true loaded cost of a direct hire.
A direct hire costs more than the wage on the offer letter. There is recruiting time, screening, onboarding, WorkSafeBC administration, vacation pay, statutory remittances, and the cost of carrying that person through any gap between projects. When the work runs out, you either keep paying or you absorb the cost and the friction of letting someone go.
Leasing converts that fixed cost into a variable one. You pay for time on site and nothing else. When the scope ends, the cost ends. The leasing company carries the worker to the next site.
For a contractor running several projects with uneven timelines, that flexibility is the whole point. You keep a stable core of direct employees and lease the swing capacity around them.

